Jul 14, 2022
In Welcome to the Forum
Among others. Many are familiar with Country Email List Foucault's claim that the authority these institutions exercise derives from his claims to specialized knowledge, which he succinctly termed "to be able-to-know”. But for Foucault this Country Email List argument was only part of a larger framework. He endlessly insisted that although power is an omnipresent force in our collective lives, it always manifests itself in concrete struggles. He wanted us to see practices like the military disciplining of bodies or the relationship between therapists and patients Country Email List as something akin to hand-to-hand combat, rather than Orwellian thought control. Power always involves an effort to control Country Email List someone's behavior: find the right foothold, identify vulnerabilities, create incentives for compliance. Foucault was not a neoliberal, but he believed that neoliberalism raised important questions. Specifically, he Country Email List wondered about the capacity of the States of Bwell-being to make fully rational health decisions for millions of people. In a 1983 interview, he reflected: “Let's take the example of dialysis: how many patients are put on dialysis, how many others are denied access? Imagine what Country Email List would happen if the reasons behind these decisions were exposed, leading to a kind of unequal treatment. Scandalous decisions would come to light. What Country Email List Foucault means is not that science is true or false (or simply "constructed"), but that invocations of science will rarely resolve political disputes, because even such ostensibly science-based issues as public health are indeed replete with non-scientific assumptions and interests. Although for Country Email List Foucault power and knowledge were always intertwined, he also argued that power had to be de-intellectualized. This is one of the many reasons why he was skeptical of Marxism. Rather than Country Email List question Marxism's claim to be a science, Foucault argued that the problem with Marxism was wanting to be a science.