This article is very delicately written. The text states how convenient 2.0 is. It is a giant baby to think that people complain that the system is not universal, and that 2.0 will make the people’s generation mess up. So the author thinks which is better or worse? Not to mention the people's generation to provide people's opinions, this is called the rule of man? The so-called rule of man is the rule of man when the ruler is above the law (rule of law). Isn't the problem that the strategy of 1.0 was wrong when it was originally planned? Then the rulers and the manufacturers have the responsibility to deal with this problem, then upgrading to 2.0, the cost can be lower and the setup can be more convenient, but the cost (tax) of the entire system is borne by the whole people, so is it not reasonable to be stinky?
Not to mention that there are actually citizens affected, so how can it become that the people are giant babies? It is true that the people's generation Special Database and even the village chiefs will want to win the Youbike pillar as a political achievement, but this is originally based on the needs of the people, the end of mass transportation, and now it is not just relying on the Youbike system to connect, but everyone has different habits. , To solve this problem scientifically, either it is allocated according to the number of people in the community, or it is to use the questionnaire to investigtion and sales locations of Quick Screening in each county and city Ukraine crisis 2022:
North Donnetsk becomes a key battleground, Putin compares himself to Tsar Peter the Great Sending water to the farthest places｜World Vision Taiject channel — Japan Hongkong Southeast Asia COVID-19 content- news Comment book summary illustration Pictures key lazy bag special report Brand joint channel Key Issues Research Center Internet Salon column BBC News in Chinese Politics and Policy politics military energy judicial Glob